Current Issue

Briefing 364
January 2009
Briefing cover
View contents page
Buy this Briefing
Buy paper copy
Buy electronic copy

RSS Updates

Grab the feed below for the latest CHN, The Longing, and Briefing Issue updates.

RSS

If you prefer the full text of the article to be included use the following feed.

RSS

Advertisement for Daily Reading Bible 14

Couldn't Help Noticing

An online survey of issues, events and ideas

The woeful ones

Briefing Reader / 13th March 2007 / Bible insights

(From Andrew Lansdown, one of our Briefing readers in Dianella, Perth, Western Australia):

Despite my family's interest, Australian Idol is not a television program I much care for. However, I have to admit that I did enjoy watching the audition process. I liked seeing how the judges (Mark Holden, Kyle Sandilands and Marcia Hines) dealt with the vastly different contestants who came before them.

I also liked the feeling of anticipation before each contestant began to sing: would he or she be wonderful or mediocre or woeful? And to tell the truth, I especially liked the woeful ones. Indeed, I found myself simultaneously enthralled and appalled by the sheer brass and badness of the worst contestants.

Were there a ‘Most Woeful’ category in Australian Idol, it would be hard to pick the winner. But let me suggest two contestants who would be among the finalists (NB: all names have been changed):

First there was Helen. She chose to sing ‘You Raise Me Up’. She screeched her way through the song, missing every note as she went. Her performance was little short of hideous.

When she finished, Mark asked her, “How do you think you went?”

She replied, her voice strained with emotion and defiance, “I think I gave it my best and that's all that matters. And if that's not good enough, then fair enough.”

“Only people that aren't any good use that as an excuse”, Kyle replied.

Then there was Jane, a nice-looking and seemingly nice-natured young woman who chose to sing ‘Misty Blue’. She did not screech like Helen, but she did sing off-key. Her voice lacked any remarkable quality and her earnestness was off-putting. Sometimes she clenched her teeth, and she somehow forced the notes to resound harshly in and from the back of her throat. And to top it off, when she held a note, she would hit it with an irritating and exaggerated vibrato. It made your eyes misty and your mood blue just thinking about how bad she was.

In the silence at the end of the song, Kyle blew a raspberry—a long one.

“Have you taped yourself and listened back to it?” he asked.

“No I haven't”, Jane replied defiantly. “I don't think I really need to, to tell you the truth.”

“Well you do”, Kyle said.

“I believed in myself”, she said. “That's the main thing.”

“Well too bad”, Kyle said. “You're kidding yourself. You're fooling yourself.”

“I don't mean to be rude, but that's your opinion”, she said. “Marcia and Mark are here, too. I'd like to hear their opinions.”

Sadly, Marcia and Mark agreed with Kyle. Kyle's judgement was not merely a personal, subjective opinion, it was also an impersonal, objective judgement. In all forms of music—as in all matters of life—there is such a thing as excellence, and its qualities can be objectively known, pursued and applied. Kyle was comparing Jane's performance against basic objective criteria, such as being able to hit a note and keep a tune, and by all objective standards, Jane's performance was a cringe affair.

How did this atrocious situation come about? How could seemingly sensible people front up to audition for something for which they had absolutely no talent? How could they so easily and earnestly make utter fools of themselves before the whole nation? The answer is that they deceived themselves. They viewed themselves and their talents differently from what they really were. They did not judge themselves truly.

They may have misjudged themselves because their friends and relatives, hoping to be kind, had pretended that they had talent. They may have done it because they were blinded by the chance of quick fortune and fame. They may have done it because they were in the habit of being precious with themselves and of making excuses for themselves. Whatever the reason, they did not judge themselves truly, and so they exposed themselves up to the judgement of the whole nation. They fooled themselves, so others came to see them as fools.

The self-deception and consequent humiliation of those woeful wannabe idols vividly portrays a universal spiritual principle. The Bible warns us to consider ourselves carefully so that we can arrive at an accurate assessment of ourselves, and thus avoid doing wrong and reaping harm. “Let a person examine himself”, the Bible says. Then it adds, “if we judged ourselves truly, we would not be judged” (1 Corinthians 11:28, 31). In context, these words are addressed to Christians and they refer to a particular aspect of Christian worship (the Lord's Supper). But they form a maxim that applies far beyond their original context: in every matter in life, we ought to examine ourselves, because if we judge ourselves truly, we will not be judged.

We tend to deceive ourselves in many matters, but the most serious self-deception usually involves the matter of our own moral nature. We generally want to think of ourselves as good. On the rare occasions when we concede that we have done or said something wrong, we quickly exonerate ourselves with all sorts of excuses.

However, the Bible claims that we all have failed to meet God's standards of goodness: there is no one who is righteous and without sin (Rom 3:23). We have all done and said and thought things that are wrong. Worse yet, our desires seem to be perverted towards what is wrong. We actually enjoy selfishness, covetousness, gossip, impure thoughts and the like. We are not only sinners in word, thought and deed, we are also sinners by nature and inclination. Consequently, our sinfulness and our sins have separated us from God, and have opened us to his judgement.

However, if we judge ourselves truly in this matter—if we judge ourselves to be sinners in need of forgiveness from God—and if, on the basis of that sober judgement, we turn in repentance and faith to the Lord Jesus Christ whom God sent to make amends for our sins by his death in our place on the cross—if we do all of that, we will not be judged and condemned as sinners on the Judgement Day.

It will carry no weight with Almighty God to say on the Day of Judgement, “I believed in myself and that's the main thing.” It will be futile to say, “I gave it my best and that's all that matters.” And it will be pointless to say, “That's just your opinion.”

Woeful is a word with two meanings—‘bad; awful’, and ‘sad; sorrowful’. It is better to own up to being woeful in the first sense today than to finish up being woeful in both senses tomorrow.

Next entry: Unable to save ourselves
Previous entry: Prophetic coinage

Search CHN

Advanced Search

RSS

Latest Entries

CHN Archives