Current Issue

Briefing 362
November 2008
Briefing cover
View contents page
Buy this Briefing
Buy paper copy
Buy electronic copy

RSS Updates

Grab the feed below for the latest CHN, The Longing, and Briefing Issue updates.

RSS

If you prefer the full text of the article to be included use the following feed.

RSS

Advertisement for Nothing in My Hand I Bring

Couldn't Help Noticing

An online survey of issues, events and ideas

Chilli crab and other food for thought

Tony Payne / 2nd August 2004

There were plenty of things to notice during the week I recently spent in Singapore, speaking at some Project Timothy conferences. Not the least, of course, was the quality and quantity of food that Singaporeans shower on their guests (and on themselves as well). The highlight was undoubtedly the chilli crab, a local specialty. (Hard to convey just how good this was: the Sri Lankan crabs used in the dish were huge, and alive until shortly before they arrived on the table; the sauce in which they were served was exquisite; and the whole thing was eaten with a finger-lickin' gusto. If it was a cheap ploy on behalf of my hosts to lure me back for future events, it definitely worked.)

Apart from the food, and the other things that visitors usually notice about Singapore (the heat and humidity, the blessed ubiquity of air conditioning, the general orderliness and cleanliness of the streets), several things impressed themselves on me:

1. The ministry battles our Singaporean brothers are facing are essentially the same as elsewhere in the world, with their own local variants. The homosexual issue has now arrived, with a ‘gay-friendly’ church having opened its doors. (Roy Clements happened to be in town to speak at this church in the same week I was.) The charismatic movement is large and influential, both in its milder, mainstream incarnations, and in its big, glitzy, prosperity-doctrine forms. In the face of this, many evangelical churches are struggling to maintain their confidence in gospel ministry, and to resist the charismatic influence.

2. For evangelicals, good quality, Bible-driven ministry built around prayerful, expository preaching is still talked about more than it is practised. As in many places, nearly everyone claims to be running a ‘Bible-based’ ministry, and to be committed to ‘expository preaching’, yet few seem to know how to do it. What passes for ‘biblical preaching’ often has the loosest connection to the text being preached, and fails to come to terms with what the text itself is saying. In this environment, David Jackman gave some excellent basic instruction in biblical preaching at the minister's conference I attended. It was received by many of the delegates as manna from heaven. Some churches, like Adam Road Presbyterian, are providing a living example of this sort of expository ministry in practice.

3. A small, committed group can achieve a lot. The brothers and sisters behind Project Timothy have, in a few short years, done a great deal to promote the cause of gospel ministry in Singapore. Their energy, enthusiasm and hard work has built a platform on which evangelical theology and ministry is being showcased and promoted, and it is having an effect.

4. And finally, on a social note, it was instructive to spend some time in a society in which the average worker puts in 60-65 hours a week. The effects of this kind of work-pattern are felt not only in family life, but in church life. In the UK and Australia, where average work hours are on the increase, we need to ponder whether we want to find ourselves in the shoes of our Singaporean brothers, where it is increasingly difficult for Christians to find time simply to meet together, when the evening family meal routinely starts at 8:30 or 9:00 pm.

Prayer changes nothing

Gordon Cheng / 1st August 2004

The book of Proverbs is full of practical insight about how to live in this world. Why, then, doesn't it say more about praying? Prayer is mentioned only three times, once to make it clear that God's not listening!—to the prayer of the unrighteous, that is.

Could the reason be that prayer changes nothing? Some Christians have a mechanical, even magical view of prayer: the more I do it, the more I get what I want. The insight of the book of Proverbs is that God alone is in control. Our focus, then is not to be on the words we speak to him. Rather we should attend to the one who listens, and who is by his Spirit inspiring us to pray. “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge”. (Prov 1:7)

Unity

Emma Thornett / 1st August 2004

Something I noticed while typing an article about unity, and who we (as Christians) can be united with, who we can't, etc. (See August web extra—“Current Issue” tab, and scroll down).

If you (hypothetically) make a typo while typing ‘unite’, you can end up with ‘untie’, which is what happens when you attempt to unite with people where there are no actual grounds for such unity. Things become untied.

Ah. Sometimes my own profundity amazes me.

Read between the lines

Ian Carmichael / 1st August 2004

Further on the topic of spin doctoring ‘scientific progress’, in John Kerry's speech the other night to the Democratic Convention he said:

What if we find a breakthrough to cure Parkinson's, diabetes, Alzheimer's and AIDs? What if we have a president who believes in science, so we can unleash the wonders of discovery like stem cell research to treat illness and save millions of lives?

Now would that be embryonic stem cell research he is meaning? (More politically convenient to leave it a bit vague, no doubt.) Of course, if you actually think that killing an embryo is wrong, then you must be someone who doesn't “believe in science”.

The real irony is the very next paragraph of his speech which shows how ‘concerned’ he is for American children:

What if we do what adults should do and make sure all our children are safe in the afternoons after school? And what if we have a leadership that's as good as the American dream so that bigotry and hatred never again steal the hope and future of any American?

Yes, wouldn't it be great if they “never again steal the hope and future of any American”? Human embryos included.

A slight technical problem

Gordon Cheng / 1st August 2004

Buried in a Reuters report on promising cancer treatment results in mouse cloning experiments is this mischievous statement: “Many researchers want to try similar experiments with human cancer cells, but the administration of President George Bush forbids the use of federal funds for such study because it would involve the creation of what is technically a human embryo.”

Now what do you suppose the word “technically” is doing in that last sentence? Either the embryo would be human, or it wouldn't. This wouldn't be an attempt to distance us from the ethical questions involved in such research, would it?

Page 7 of 7 pages « First  <  5 6 7

Search CHN

Advanced Search

RSS

Latest Entries

CHN Archives