Current Issue

Briefing 361
October 2008
Briefing cover
View contents page
Buy this Briefing
Buy paper copy
Buy electronic copy

RSS Updates

Grab the feed below for the latest CHN, The Longing, and Briefing Issue updates.

RSS

If you prefer the full text of the article to be included use the following feed.

RSS

Advertisement for Nothing in My Hand I Bring

Couldn't Help Noticing

An online survey of issues, events and ideas

You beauty

Karen Beilharz / 2nd February 2006

Whenever I see ads about skincare products, I start worrying about whether I'm moisturizing enough and whether, at the ripe old age of twenty-seven, I'll break out into an epidemic of wrinkles.

One helpful antidote to such irrational thoughts is thinking about Sarah, Abraham's wife. In her retirement years, she and Abraham did the overland tour, coming all the way over from Ur of the Chaldeans down south into the dry lonely country of the Promised Land. She was in her mid-sixties when she first set foot on Egyptian soil, and she was so good-looking that Pharaoh himself sought her out to take her as his wife (Genesis 12). But just in case you're thinking that Pharaoh and his court really needed to get their glasses checked (or at least invent some for the sake of their eyes), at the age of 90, Sarah was still such a stunner that King Abimelech of Gerar fell head over heels and took her into his household. Does a woman's stock plummet as she gets older? In Sarah's case, definitely not!

Well, perhaps ancient near-eastern people age differently than we do now. I doubt it; Paul said that Abraham was “as good as dead” at a hundred (Rom 4:19) and, despite the 10-year difference in their ages, Sarah was probably much the same. Maybe they were fine specimens of humanity who didn't need plastic surgery. I doubt it; I think that our standards of beauty have changed so much, it's hard for us to think of a 65-year-old women in the same terms as Naomi Campbell. But what is considered beautiful is also relative to culture and race; if Sarah entered a Miss Universe contest today, she'd probably be laughed off the stage.

This makes me wonder if there is a universal standard of beauty—one not bound to culture, time, race or even religion. Unsurprisingly, the answer is found in the Lord who “[makes]everything beautiful in its time” (Eccl 3:11). The true standard of beauty must come from the beauty of God, whom David longs to gaze upon all the days of his life (Psalm 27:4). This might seem odd, given that God in the flesh wasn't a particularly attractive person (“he had no form or majesty that we should look at him, and no beauty that we should desire him” [Isa 53:2]) but I think Peter's instructions to wives might help us out here:

Do not let your adorning be external—the braiding of hair, the wearing of gold, or the putting on of clothing—but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which in God's sight is very precious. (1 Pet 3:3-4)

In other words, what will make you beautiful does not come from what's on the outside but rather what's on the inside—a gentle and quiet spirit. And in case we miss the point of what a “gentle and quiet spirit” is, Peter goes on to say, “For this is how the holy women who hoped in God used to adorn themselves, by submitting to their husbands, as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord” (1 Pet 3:5-6). Having a “gentle and quiet spirit” means being submissive, and in the context of 1 Peter 2, submissive means putting yourself under the authority of those who have the right of authority over you—governments, masters, husbands and, of course, God, as the unalluring Christ did when he submitted himself to his executors (see 1 Peter 2:21-24 for Peter's take on Isa 53).

Sarah may have been a babe but she wasn't beautiful in God's sight because she was physically attractive. She was one of the holy women who “hoped in God” (cf. Heb 11:11). She adorned herself, not with the gold of Egypt or the silver of Gerar, but with the glory of submission and obedience. We may not all look like supermodels and we may not be able to stop our skin from sagging and wrinkling, but, whether we're 16 or 65, striving to sustain a spirit of submission should make us look hot, moisturizer or no.

Breaking the Happy News

Guan Un / 1st February 2006

To some extent, there's nothing more that I'll need to tell you about the subject that the web address, HappyNews.com doesn't say.

If you think you'd prefer your newspapers or news sites without those stories on death, terror and corruption that might put a damper on your day, HappyNews is for you. Or, as their title tagline puts it: “All The News That's Fun To Print”.

Their “credo”, available on their front page, goes further: “‘Real News, Compelling Stories, Always Positive’ is what you'll find on HappyNews.com. We believe virtue, goodwill and heroism are hot news. That's why we bring you up-to-the-minute news, geared to lift spirits and inspire lives.”

The site itself shows examples that they're not taking themselves too seriously. Their stocks summary box carries this warning, “Unhappy News Alert! Click at your own risk”. The horoscope for Jan 31 said, “Good news! The stars do not control your destiny. You do”. In my favourite touch, the site lists links to more established news outlets like CNN and BBC under the capitalized heading, “Unhappy News”.

But despite those tongue-in-cheek touches, a visit had me thinking that they might have a point. Some sample headlines on the day I visited read, “Connecticut to launch eHealth program”, “Congo president holds first peace meeting”, “New Year brings new homes to families in Sri Lanka”. All are worthwhile news stories about events that we should be thankful for.

A look at CNN on the same day lists none of the above, those stories presumably buried by issues such as the upcoming State of the Union address, the difficult political situation in Iran, a workplace shooting, and a nightclub fire.

However there's something that makes me uneasy with the idea that someone might choose to only read the Happy News site. It's not that anything in their intent or purpose is erroneous, but the error they make (purposefully, they would probably argue) is the error of omission. And it's an error that is a good warning to what we do in church and how we live as Christians.

Are we as God's people, too focussed on the kingdom of darkness that the world still lives in, to be able to focus on the salvation at hand? Or are we the other way round, too focussed on the salvation that we have now, to realize our continued sinfulness, and to examine the ways we rebel against God in our own lives?

In the same way that always wearing rose-coloured glasses will lead to accidents at traffic lights, we must try not to go through life unbalanced, remembering there is no salvation, without a peril to be saved from. So I'll be thankful that I stumbled upon happynews.com for pointing out this imbalance in my outlook on current affairs and spiritual affairs, but I'll be much more thankful of The Good News that changed my life.

Page 4 of 4 pages « First  <  2 3 4

Search CHN

Advanced Search

RSS

Latest Entries

CHN Archives